A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath also said it did not appear that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had considered the objections raised by the cellular operators against the compensatory regulation which mandates them to pay consumers one rupee per call drop experienced on their networks, subject to a cap of Rs 3 a day.
In his response, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) P S Narasimha, appearing for TRAI, said a technical consultation paper was sent to all stakeholders, including telecom firms, on the call drops issue and all their representations were considered before the rule was made.
The ASG said the compensatory rule was made due to consumer complaints that call drops were happening more often and added that the call drops amounted to the service providers "breaching" the contract they have with the users.
Also Read
Narasimha contended that currently, the telecom firms were not compensating consumers for call drops by taking advantage of TRAI's undertaking that it would not take coercive steps against them and said the regulation has to be implemented.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the telecom majors, contended that under the Quality of Service regulations, which are to be adhered to as part of the licence conditions, two per cent of call drops are exempted.
Singhvi told the court that the companies would incur huge loss if they pay the compensation as call drops could occur for no fault in their service.
Narasimha, in response, said in the first quarter of 2015 there were
around 25,787 crore outgoing calls on the network of the 12 licencees/operators and the number of call drops came were 200 crore, whereas the revenue of the service providers was Rs 36,787 crore for the same period.
He said the compensation payable would be only a "flea bite" and thus the regulation must come into force and added that the consumers are demanding that they be compensated for every dropped call, but TRAI has capped it at three.
He said all the telecom majors want to reduce call drops and were working towards that in a phased manner.
There cannot be seamless connectivity when travelling from area to area and even under the quality of service regulations, the companies are required to maintain 90 per cent coverage, he said.
He contended that the regulation was arbitrary and unreasonable and had no legislative sanction and added that the call drops was occurring due to lack of towers.
After hearing arguments for over two hours, the court listed the matter for further hearing on January 11.
The court was hearing pleas filed by Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (AUSPI) and 21 telecom operators, challenging TRAI's October 16, 2015, rule mandating them to pay consumers one rupee per call drop experienced on their networks, subject to a cap of Rs 3 a day.
It had also said that lack of investment by telecom firms in network infrastructure like mobile towers, appears to be the main reason behind the "pervasive problem" of call drops across the country.