IVG is the method, most advanced in mice, by which gametes are derived from pluripotent stem cells (capable of giving rise to several different cell types) or embryonic stem cells. IVG in humans could potentially allow for never-before used methods of procreation.
Research suggests that whilst not yet advanced enough on human cells, IVG for reproduction may one day be possible in humans.
Using a relational autonomy framework, Professor Sonia Suter from George Washington University is analysing the potential benefits and harms of IVG, which depend on the social, scientific, and legal contexts in which it is used.
Several groups of people could potentially use IVG for reproduction: those who cannot conceive for physical reasons, same-sex couples, postmenopausal women or premenarche girls, and groups of more than two - multiplex parenting.
Also Read
Same-sex couples must currently rely on gamete donors when using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as artificial insemination or IVF with a surrogate.
What distinguishes IVG from current ART is that it would allow such couples to have biologically related children without using gamete donors, researchers said.
Suter also discussed the implications of 'perfecting reproduction' with IVG.
"IVG could play a role in efforts to have a healthy or enhanced child" by making prenatal selection "much easier and more robust," she said.
It could, for example, be used to create many more embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis than we can today, vastly refining the ability to select embryos.
Perhaps most crucial to the future use of IVG, as she also points out, are the potential risks of the procedure.
"The only way to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of these techniques in humans is to use in vitro gametes to try to produce viable offspring in controlled settings - when and if we deem it sufficiently safe to do so," she said.
The study was published in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences.