An article titled 'Tawang's history affirms China's sovereignty' in the Global Times alleged that "India has pursued expansionism" since gaining independence in 1947.
"Influenced by the British, India sent troops to the north, beyond the traditional customary border between China and India," said the article written by Jia Liang of theCentre for Tibetan Studies of Sichuan University.
The new piece is part of a number of critical articles Chinese state media organisations have published since the Dalai Lama began his visit to Arunachal Pradesh on April 4.
Tawang, in northern Arunachal Pradesh, is believed to be the birthplace of the sixth Dalai Lama in 1683 and is at the centre of the Tibetan Buddhism, which makes China wary of the influence of the 14th Dalai Lama, whom it considers a "dangerous separatist".
The article said prior to his exile in India in 1959, the Dalai Lama refused to recognise India's sovereignty over Tawang but changed his stand later.
"The Chinese People's Liberation Army once retook the town in the 1962 border war, but the Indian army reoccupied the area the next year," it said, without elaborating why the Chinese military withdrew from the region after announcing a unilateral ceasefire.
"In 1972, the North East Frontier Agency became the Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh," which was officially upgraded to a state in February 1987 after a legislation was passed by the Parliament of India at the end of 1986.
Referring the Chinese military taking over Tibet in 1951, the article said, the Dalai Lama in a telegram to Chinese central government pledged to assist the PLA in "safeguarding the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the motherland".
But, the article claimed, after the 1962 war, the Dalai Lama "slandered that China invaded India and he gave 17.5 kilogrammes of gold to India as a financial endorsement for fighting against China."
"The Dalai Lama and his supporters, who have been in exile in India for a long time, have obsequiously depended on New Delhi for their survival," it said.
Referring to Dalai Lama's comments in 2010, that "it is indisputable that I am a son of India... I am a Tibetan in appearance because my parents are Tibetans, but spiritually I am Indian," the article said. "As of last month, he has labelled himself as 'a son of India' at least 21 times".
"Therefore, as 'a son of India' why is he qualified to talk about 'representing the people of Tibet' and the religion, language, culture and human rights in Tibet?," it said.
"What's more, the Dalai Lama should not overestimate his influence on China-India relations. It has been proven in both history and status quo that no matter how the Dalai Lama acts as a pawn or a troublemaker, the fact that the 'McMahon Line' and 'Arunachal Pradesh' are illegitimate and ineffective cannot be disputed," it said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app