"India is siding with a woman who was in the wrong - who lied, paid her help poorly and now is brazen enough to claim that she should not be treated like a criminal," said a column in The Washington Post on the arrest of Devyani Khobragade.
"What's 'deplorable', to use the prime minister's words, is not Khobragade's treatment, which was standard, but the fact that many in India aren't speaking out against the treatment of the nanny," said the column titled 'Why India is upset about Devyani Khobragade, and why it's wrong'.
The New York Times criticised the Indian government for its stand on Khobragade, the Deputy Consul General in New York, who was arrested last week for alleged visa fraud.
"India's overwrought reaction to the arrest of one of its diplomats in the US is unworthy of a democratic government," the Times said in an editorial.
More From This Section
"Officials in New Delhi have inflamed anti-American outrage instead of calling for justice, especially for the domestic worker who is at the heart of the case."
"Instead of concerning themselves with that injustice, many in India seem incensed that Ms. Khobragade was arrested at all," the editorial said.
It further said the charges brought against Khobragade by Preet Bharara, the US attorney in Manhattan, should concern anyone who values worker rights.
The editorial titled 'India's Misplaced Outrage' claimed even more disturbing was the fact that Indian officials would take extreme steps to retaliate for the arrest, such as removing security barriers at the US Embassy in New Delhi.
"Despite the way many Indians seem to view the case, it is not a challenge to India's honour. It is a charge against one diplomat accused of submitting false documents to evade the law. Ms. Khobragade's lawyer said she would plead not guilty and challenge the arrest on the grounds of diplomatic immunity, which prosecutors say does not apply in this case," the daily said.