"When it comes to intellectual property rights (IPR), I must firmly put on record that India is signatory to Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and our laws are fully compliant with the agreement of the WTO. India has never deviated, never diluted (its law)," Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma told reporters here.
Sharma was replying to a question that the US has alleged that India's IPR norms discriminates American companies particularly in the pharmaceutical sector.
Sharma said issuance of a CL is a flexibility available to all countries and India has used it only once after following a "due process" unlike the US which has issued such licences several times through executive authorities.
"India has never invoked (this facility) through an executive authority which India can. And in this (Nexavar) case also it was not the executive decision. The US has invoked executive decisions for CLs," he said.
Also Read
Under the Indian Patents Act, a CL can be issued for a drug if the medicine is deemed unaffordable by the government and grants permission to qualified generic drug makers to manufacture it.
As per the WTO norms, a CL can be invoked by a national government allowing a company to produce a patented product without the consent of the patent owner in public interest.
However he added that if the Health Ministry would ask to issue a CL within the ambit of India's international commitments and obligations, "we will not be violating (any law) by accepting the formal recommendations of the health department".
He said the issue was raised by some American lobbyists in a particular sector "which is crucial not only for India but for every country of the world to ensure availability of life saving medicines at affordable prices to their citizens".