The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, signed on October 25 in 1980, provides for a mechanism to return a child internationally abducted by a parent from one member country to another.
The signatories to the multilateral treaty include the US and the UK, and there has been a debate over whether India should join it or not.
"India should join the Hague Convention. So, many countries, over 90 of them have signed it. India has not done it, since there are a few notions attached with it. I do not see any reason, why our country should not be a signatory to it," Soli told PTI on the sidelines of an event.
"India is a in a state of flux. There is 'India vs Bharat' situation. While the India is shining and prospering, the other part ('Bharat') is still struggling and so there is a wide gulf between the rich and the poor," he said.
Also Read
The debate on whether India should join the Hague Convention, is "sharply divided", the apex court judge said.
"But, should few cases block our vision and we should not sign the convention? Which aspects should we consider while taking into account the welfare of the child, (in case of marital dispute)," he asked.
Besides Sorbajee, a senior US official and a Chicago- based attorney also pitched for India to join the convention.
US-based lawyer Molshree Sharma, another panelist, said, "India should sign the convention.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content