In a 61-page ruling issued yesterday, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey in Newark said the jury had found Ravi guilty of bias intimidation under a law that was later deemed "constitutionally defunct."
Ravi, a former Rutgers University student, was convicted in March 2012 on 15 counts of bias intimidation, invasion of privacy, hindering prosecution and tampering with evidence for spying on the sexual encounter of hisroommate Tyler Clementi, 18 with another man through a webcam in September 2010."
Ravi was not charged with causing or contributing to Clementi's death.
Ravi, now 24, was sentenced to a month in Middlesex County jail and was released in June 2016 after completing 20 days in prison and getting five days credit for good behaviour.
Also Read
Ravi, who had faced up to 10 years in prison, had also been sentenced to three years' of supervised release, ordered to do 300 hours of community service and pay a fine ofabout 11,000 dollars.
Ravi'sattorney Steve Altman told the Wall Street Journal he was pleased with court's decision.
"Dharun Ravi, whatever he did or didn't do, had no homophobic motive involved."
The case had garnered international attention and Clementi's suicide had sparked an outrage in the country, giving rise to a debate on cyberbullying and treatment of young gays and lesbians.
In April 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court had ruled that the state's bias-intimidation law was unconstitutional, giving hope to Ravi and his lawyers that his conviction would be reversed and he will be accorded a new trial.
However, the state Supreme Court had unanimously ruled that the 2001 statute was "unconstitutionally vague," striking down the third section of the statute that focused on the victim's state of mind.
The ruling had said it is the defendant's intent and state of mind that is important, not the victim's.
"Finally, we conclude that the evidence the State presented to
prove the charges (on bias intimidation) tainted the jury's verdict on the remaining charges, depriving defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial," they said.
While ordering a new trial for Ravi on 10 other counts that included invasion of privacy and tampering with evidence, the judges said their verdict does not in any way condone his acts.
They said "the social environment that transformed a private act of sexual intimacy into a grotesque voyeuristic spectacle must be unequivocally condemned in the strongest possible way."
They said the sense of loss associated with a young man taking his own life "defies our meager powers of reason and tests our resolve to seekconsolation."
In a written statement, Clementi's parents, Joe and Jane Clementi, said the decision "shows ushow much more work there is to be done, andwill push usforward with stronger determination tocreate a kinder, moreempathetic society where every person is valued and respected."