The apex court last week struck down a portion of the state's bias crime statute that could win Dharun Ravi a new trial in the Tyler Clementi webcam case, his attorney said.
According to the earlier state statute on bias intimidation, defendants can be convicted of bias intimidation if their victims "reasonably believed" they were harassed or intimidated because of their race, colour, gender, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation.
The ruling said that it is the defendant's intent and state of mind that is important, not the victim's.
A report in nj.Com quoted Ravi's attorney Steven Altman as saying that the decision directly strikes down one of Ravi's convictions, which was based on that section.
Also Read
The appeal of Ravi's 2012 guilty verdict that included several bias intimidation charges is still ongoing.
The Supreme Court ruling also brings into question decisions made by the trial judge, Superior Court Judge Glenn Berman.
Berman did not permit Altman to introduce evidence during the trial that Clementi was upset over his mother's rejection of his homosexuality and other incidents in his life.
Berman also prohibited Altman from obtaining some items seized from Clementi's possessions and computer, including the suicide note, Altman was quoted as saying.
"Now the argument has to be that the judge permitted evidence that taints the entire verdict," the attorney said.
"The evidence about Tyler Clementi's state-of-mind. Did that prejudice the jury?"
Middlesex County Prosecutor Andrew Carey, however, said that Ravi's conviction "still stands, and it would be inappropriate to comment further given the state's ongoing appeal of the sentence.