He, however, said the importance given to research in the universities is still inadequate and recalled that while assuming office of President, he had described education as the alchemy that can bring India its next golden age.
The President was speaking at the Rashtrapati Bhavan after receiving a report on 'State of Indian Universities in the Global Academic Rankings' from O P Jindal Global University and Indian Centre for Academic Rankings and Excellence(ICARE).
He said in the last four years along with protecting, preserving and defending the Constitution, he has pursued improving quality of higher education as a constant theme.
Mukherjee said many universities were earlier doing well but not enough data was being provided to ranking agencies and expressed happiness over the work being done to raise the standards of Indian varsities.
More From This Section
Speaking on the occasion, Amitabh Kant, Chief Executive Officer of NITI Aayog, cited quality of research and lack of international students and faculty as reasons for the current state of Indian universities in the global rankings.
"NITI Aayog is preparing a scheme and a framework for the identification of 10 public and 10 private Indian universities which could be given greater autonomy and funding with a view to making them world class varsities," he said.
"India needs substantive regulatory reforms that could within the next decade culminate in the development of world class universities in India," he said.
According to the report, India has five institutions in the top 50 and nine in the top 100 in the University Rankings Asia, 2016 and figures among the top 10 Research Producing Nations Globally.
From 31 institutions in the rankings last year, India now has 44 institutions in the top 250 of the BRICS Rankings 2016, it said adding the Delhi University has jumped from 46 rank last year to 41 this year.
resolution is absorbed through private innovation, such innovation should always be encouraged instead of exhausting the judiciary's resources. Therefore, the Government needs to create an enabling framework for institutional arbitrations in India".
In absence of centralised state based dispute resolution institutions, private market based solutions step in, he said.
Parties can resolve disputes by privately constituted arbitral tribunal, he said, adding lack of a centralised state based institutions like the judiciary gives flexibility to arbitration.
"But it also increases cost if for each and every dispute the parties have to separately draft rules, appoint arbitrators, procure administrative services -- the cost of dispute resolution would naturally be much higher. Arbitral institutions help in mitigate these costs," he said.
"But unlike Courts, they comply in the private competitive market. Thus institutional arbitration takes advantage of economies of scale to facilitate arbitration without imposing the rigidity of the traditional judicial institutions," he said.
President said for arbitral institutions to expand their footprint, they need to partner with the Indian legal profession.
"A vibrant arbitration ecosystem would need a vibrant arbitration bar as well as respected pool of seasoned arbitrators.