The chamber drew the idea from the Economic Survey 2016-17, which had said: "A UBI for women can not only reduce the fiscal cost of providing a UBI (to about half) but have large multiplier effects on the household.
"Giving money to women also improves the bargaining power of women within households and reduces concerns of money being splurged on conspicuous goods," it said.
The Economic Survey 2016-17 was tabled by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in Parliament on January 31.
It argued that if women have money in their accounts, their economic and social status would see a tremendous uplift. In the long run, this would also bring in corrections in the adverse sex ratio as the society would see women as an empowered lot.
"The issues of child mortality, infant mortality and even nutrition during pregnancy can be addressed if UBI is extended to women.
"It could be argued that women from the rich and upper middle income groups do not deserve to be provided government support. But the problem of identifying correct beneficiaries is far greater than the cost of an all-inclusive scheme," Assocham Women Foundation Chairperson Revati Jain said.