Internet technologies are likely exacerbating the behaviour of selective exposure, according to Ivan Dylko, an assistant professor at the University at Buffalo in US.
"We tend to look for information that confirms our points of view," said Dylko.
"It bolsters self-esteem, helps us effectively cope with political information overload, but on the other hand, it means we're minimising exposure to information that challenges us," Dylko said.
Dylko developed a model that explores political impact of customisability and suggests how the "automatic and consistent inclusion, exclusion and presentation of information" encourages political selective exposure.
Newspaper readers once had to decide which local paper to read. The same has been true of what people we chose to talk to and associate with for thousands of years.
But what media consumers did with print and broadcast is not the same process that emerges online, nor is the idea of selective exposure as intuitive as it might seem, with researchers divided on its consequences.
Users now have an unprecedented amount of information to deal with - forcing them to be more selective than ever; they have an unprecedented diversity of content choices - allowing them to find content that matches their beliefs and attitudes more closely than ever; and they have customisable technology providing control over the information they receive.
Online, the process is automatic, sometimes user driven, but also system driven, often occurring without a user's knowledge.
Facebook, which 63 per cent of its users say serves as a news source, according to Pew Research Centre, is built on customisability, the researchers said.
Users add and remove friends, events and groups from their environment while the site analyses all of this activity and determines what personal news cycle to present. Same is true of Twitter and numerous other popular websites.
"They increase political selective exposure, making us more surrounded with like-minded information and, potentially, making us more politically polarised," he said.
The study was published in the journal Communication Theory.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app