A researcher from BI Norwegian Business School in Norway studied what is needed to make good decisions in crisis situations.
Bjorn T Bakken developed a simulator where test participants made decisions in different types of crises, such as natural disasters, major accidents and terrorist attacks.
Each participant was placed in front of a computer in the laboratory. The monitor showed a map where various types of incidents pop up during the 30 minute test.
The participants had different kinds of resources available to them, like planes, cars and other vehicles, which they had to use as best as they can. Decisions were to be made under time pressure and in critical situations.
Also Read
The preferred decision style of those who took part in experiments and problem-solving exercises was identified.
"Those who normally prefer combining intuitive decisions with analysis made the best decisions in the crisis situations," Bakken concluded.
Bakken distinguished between intuitive and analytical styles of decision-making.
This does not mean decisions are made haphazardly, or merely on a gut feeling. An intuitive decision style is developed through experience.
Analytical decision style was described as making decisions in a thorough, systematic manner by spending time reviewing all the details and making sure all decisions comply with formal guidelines and requirements.
"In a real crisis, you simply don't have time to wait for sufficient information to build up a picture and analyse the situation," Bakken said.
"You need to make the initial decisions quickly, based on your experience-based intuition. As you receive more information, you can analyse your way to adjustments and more decisions.