INX media PMLA case: ED custody of Karti's CA extended by three days

A Delhi court today extended by the ED custody of Karti Chidambaram's chartered accountant S Bhaskararaman by three days in connection with the INX Media money laundering case.
Special judge N K Malhotra allowed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to interrogate Bhaskararaman till February 26 after the agency said he was required to be quizzed for seven more days.
ED's special public prosecutor Nitesh Rana said the accused needed to be confronted with various documents recovered during the probe which was at a very crucial stage.
Bhaskararaman, who was arrested from a five-star hotel in the heart of the national capital last Friday, was produced before the court after expiry of five-day ED custody.

Karti's name had cropped up in the case which relates to Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approval granted in 2007 for receipt of funds by INX Media when his father and senior Congress leader P Chidambaram was the Union finance minister during the previous UPA regime.
The ED had earlier claimed that during the course of investigation, it was revealed that Bhaskararaman, a qualified chartered accountant, had been assisting Karti to manage his "ill-gotten wealth" in India and abroad.

The agency had said the investigation required the presence of Bhaskararaman for collecting vital evidence and other information which was within his special knowledge and exclusive domain.

It had alleged that INX Media had deliberately and in violation of the conditions of the approval made a downstream investment of 26 per cent in the capital of INX News Pvt Ltd without specific approval of FIPB, which included indirect foreign investment by same foreign investors, and had generated Rs 305 crore foreign direct investment in INX Media Pvt Ltd against the approved foreign inflow of Rs 4.62 crore.
To wriggle out of the situation without any punitive action, INX Media entered into a criminal conspiracy with Karti, the ED has alleged.
The FIPB unit of the finance ministry not only granted the illegal approval but also misinformed the investigation wing of Income Tax Department, it claimed.

The agency had said the CA's custody was needed to ascertain the trail of various properties involved in money laundering, to identify movable and immovable properties, involved and further ascertain the role of the accused and his other associates in the case.