Downplaying his role in the controversy, Nihalani said he never imposes his views on the movies that come for certification.
"The film is viewed by the examining committee, not by me. We follow the guidelines and decide according to it. If a film fails to pass from the examining committee, then I watch it and decide whether it should go to the revising committee. That's the only role I have. I am not the deciding authority," he told reporters here.
The film's producers are locked in a bitter battle with Nihalani for demanding multiple cuts in the movie besides allegedly asking them to remove Punjab from its title.
Aggrieved by the order of the revising committee of the board that suggested changes in the film before its scheduled release on June 17, the makers had moved the HC. The court will pass orders in the case on June 13.
Also Read
Nihalani also denied asking for the removal of the word 'Punjab' from the title of the movie.
"Title was intact. We did not ask that it should be removed, only the references."
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has been in news for its controversial decisions be it proposing a list of 28 banned cuss words, demanding cuts in films like "Udta Punjab", "Jai Gangajal", "NH 10", "Dum Laga Ke Haisha", "Angry Indian Godesses" and even shortening the kissing scenes in James Bond movie "Spectre".
The Shahid Kapoor-Alia Bhatt starrer deals with the issue of how the youth in Punjab are succumbing to drug addiction.