"There is nothing anti-national if any person is defending Article 35A. However Omar is creating hype on Article 35A, when the case of its legality is being heard in Supreme Court. He is trying to divide the people on the regional as well on religion basis," J&K BJP spokesperson Virender Gupta said.
Reacting to Abdullah's statement yesterday that defending the Constitution of India, to which Article 35A is integral, cannot be anti-national, Gupta said continuation of the article depends on the judgement of the Supreme Court and "wishes of the people of the country as a whole".
He claimed that people of Jammu and Ladakh regions always opposed Article 35A and Article 370 right from the day of their inception in the Constitution.
"These were incorporated in Indian Constitution by (former Prime Minister) Jawaharlal Nehru to please and placate the Kashmiri leadership without taking people of Jammu region and Ladakh into confidence. These articles may have been helpful to establish the autocracy of Kashmiri leaders and to satisfy their whims, whereas the common man of the valley has suffered and has remained aggrieved," he said.
More From This Section
"They were discriminated against in services, administration and development activities. They have been being treated as second class citizens. The identity and demography of the Jammu and Ladakh regions are meeting serious challenges from the valley leadership," he alleged.
In reply to Abdullah's charge that PDP betrayed the trust of the valley while joining alliance with the BJP, Gupta said it equally applies to National Conference when it joined the government at the Centre led by then PM Atal Behari Vajpayee.