The landmark judgment by a bench of justices Muzaffar Hussain Attar and B S Walia came yesterday on a petition by SAC against the 2013 order of Justice Hasnain Massodi. The state government had opposed the plea.
While restoring the suo motu powers of SAC, the bench said that though the Commission has to act in accordance with the statute but its functioning cannot be circumscribed or limited by the statute. As such this Commission cannot be denied the power to initiate suo motu action for achieving the purpose of considerable public importance.
The SAC had strongly pleaded before the high court seeking restoration of suo motu powers to look into complaints against erring public functionaries.
The SAC fielded senior Supreme Court advocate Colin Gonsalves and referred to various provisions of Accountability Commission Act of 2002 to urge the court that provisions of the Act required to be given a purposive interpretation.
Also Read
A division bench headed by Chief Justice N Paul Vasanthakumar had earlier heard the commission'ss appeal on the issue against the order of a single judge that the panel had no suo-motu powers to proceed against accused public functionaries.
The state government, however, has taken a contrary stand saying that SAC had no suo-motu power to investigate or inquire into a complaint against a public functionary.
The newly-composed SAC headed by former Chief Justice B A Khan is making efforts to regain the powers of the commission under the original legislation.
The Commission Act has undergone multiple amendments making the commission powerless and ineffective, according to critics.
On January 7, 2013, the high court ruled that SAC cannot suo-motu direct investigation, inquiry or proceedings against a public functionary on the basis of an anonymous or as good as anonymous complaint.