"Japan has requested the WTO Dispute Settlement Body for establishment of the panel in the WTO dispute...Alleging that India's safeguard measures on certain iron and steel products are inconsistent with the WTO obligations," Commerce and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha.
She said when the matter was raised by certain members at a World Trade Organization (WTO) council, India conveyed that the measures including minimum import price were taken to address concerns of the domestic industry on unprecedented surge in imports of steel products due to unfair international business practices such as predatory pricing in the sector.
Japan in December dragged India to WTO against certain measures taken by New Delhi on imports of iron and steel products.
Japan, which is the second largest steel producer in the world, had alleged that duties imposed on steel imports by India violates WTO trade norms.
More From This Section
In September 2015, India imposed provisional safeguard duty of 20 per cent on import of certain categories of steel with a view to protect domestic producers. Later in November last year, the government slapped the final duty.
After 60 days, if consultations fail to resolve the dispute, the complainant may request adjudication by a panel.
Bilateral trade between the two countries was USD 14.51 billion in 2015-16. Trade is highly in favour of Japan.
In a separate reply, Sitharaman said that India is poised to push many topics in the WTO ministerial conference at Argentina in December including a permanent solution to the issue of public stock-holding of foodgrains and discussions on trade facilitation agreement in services.
The agreement is aimed to ease movement of skilled professionals across the borders.