The first bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh and Justice R Mahadevan asked the government to respond by March 20 and posted the matter to that day.
The court gave the direction on petitions by senior DMK functionary J Anbalagan, MLA, and Advocates Forum for Social Justice with similar pleas.
The bench orally observed that display of portraits in private offices or offices of political parties could not be gone into, but said the government should respond to all queries raised by the petitioners related to display of portraits in government offices and schemes.
The portraits of a convicted person cannot be displayed in the government offices or in the schemes implemented by the government, he argued.
Also Read
He further submitted that a representation was already made to the government in this regard on February 25.
To this, the bench observed, "Give them breathing time. Let them take a decision on displaying the portraits in public offices post-conviction.Let them answer all queries raised by you."
Noting that her photographs were affixed on doles such as free table fan, mixie and grinder, besides school bag, geometry box, etc, Balu said, "Even in a dictator-ruled nation this would not happen."
To this, the bench remarked, "This is the style of administration that exists here for several decades."
The petitioner had sought removal of Jayalalithaa's photograph and the name 'Amma', as the late leader was affectionately called, from all government schemes.
However, the apex court abated the proceedings against Jayalalithaa in view of her death on December 5 last.
Jayalalithaa, her close aide and current AIADMK General Secretary V K Sasikala and two others were accused of amassing disproportionate assets to the tune of Rs 66.65 crore during her first term as the chief minister from 1991 to 1996.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content