In her first meeting with the Prime Minister after her election victory, she said Tamil Nadu is concerned about the impact the proposed GST will have on the fiscal economy of the states and the huge revenue loss it is likely to cause to manufacturing and net exporting state like hers.
Jayalalithaa-led AIADMK has 13 MPs in the Rajya Sabha where the BJP-led NDA government is in a minority and looks to its support on crucial issues and legislations. The party has 37 MPs in the lower house.
This included the GST Council as a Constitutional body which it said impinges on the legislative sovereignty of both Parliament and state legislatures and jeopardises the autonomy of the states in fiscal matters.
"We strongly object to the provision for the GST Council. The existing mechanism of the Empowered Committee of state ministers which dealt with VAT issues is adequate. Ideally, no statutory GST Council is required," it said.
More From This Section
(Reopens DEL72)
The chief minister said it is quite clear that a manufacturing state like Tamil Nadu will permanently lose substantial revenue if GST is implemented.
"Due to the difficulty in fixing even nominally high revenue neutral rates, it is expected that the extend of revenue loss under GST would be around Rs 9,270 crores for Tamil Nadu," the memorandum said.
Tamil Nadu also reiterated its demand for a Constitutionally mandated independent compensation mechanism for full (100 per cent) compensation of revenue losses suffered by the states for a period of not less that five years.
Further, the memorandum said, as this comes out of the CGST component, it does not affect the destination state's revenue or cause any cascading.
"Hence, the stand of the Government of Tamil Nadu is that before the Constitutional Amendment Bill on GST is taken up, the Government of India should strive for a board consensus on important issues like the compensation period and methodology, revenue neutral rates, floor rates with bands, commodities to be excluded from GST, the IGST model and clarity on dual administrative control, so that the genuine apprehensions of states regarding loss of fiscal autonomy and permanent revenue loss are allayed," it said.