The Nilakottai Judicial Magistrate in Dindigul district had ordered a businessman to pay an interim monthly maintenance of Rs. 2,500 each to his wife and daughter.
Justice S Vimala of the HC partly allowed the criminal revision petition filed by the businessman and confirmed the order only with respect to the payment to be made to the child. She said the maintenance for wife could be suspended and given while issuing the final order.
Granting maintenance was a measure of social justice, intended to prevent the vagrancy of destituteness. A child should not be denied instant justice at any cost, the judge said.
The husband had filed a petition in the family court for restituion of conjugal rights.
More From This Section
The magistrate felt that the husband had not taken any effective steps to take back the wife, except filing the petition for restitution of conjugal rights, hence the order of the magistrate could not be set aside.
Directing the petitioner to provide interim relief for the child, the judge said that in this case the father was liable to maintain his daughter. The liability was absolute for daughter. Hower in the case of his wife, the justifiability of her to live away from her husband was the main issue and it had to be decided.