In a statement issued here, IJU President S N Sinha, Secretary-General Devulapalli Amar and Press Council of India Member K Amarnath rejected the argument that the film glorified one of the convicts in the case, Mukesh Singh, by highlighting his 'perverse' comments slighting the feminine gender and justifying his heinous crime.
"On the other hand, the film brought to the fore, the deep prejudices harboured in the minds of a section of the people in the country. While we publish and propagate the gender-insensitive dictums of a section that fancies itself as the 'guardians of public morality', it is hypocritical to think that such documentaries will damage the prestige of the country abroad", the IJU said.
You’ve hit your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app