The lawsuit was brought by a California woman, Eva Echeverria, who alleged Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately warn consumers about the potential cancer risks of talcum powder.
Echeverria developed ovarian cancer as a "proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective nature of talcum powder," Echeverria said in her lawsuit.
Echeverria's attorney, Mark Robinson, said his client hoped the verdict would lead Johnson & Johnson to include additional warnings on its products.
"She really didn't want sympathy," he added. "She just wanted to get a message out to help these other women." Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman Carol Goodrich said in a statement that the company will appeal the jury's decision.
Also Read
She says while the company sympathizes with those impacted by ovarian cancer, she says science supports the safety of Johnson's baby powder.
She had blamed her illness on her use for more than 40 years of the company's talcum powder-containing products. Besides that case, three other jury trials in St. Louis reached similar outcomes last year - issuing awards of $72 million, USD 70.1 million and USD 55 million, for a combined total of USD 307.6 million.
Goodrich said the company is preparing for additional trials in the US and will continue to defend the product's safety.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content