Child rights activists and lawyers have said that Delhi government's proposal was not a solution for the increasing number of crimes by the minors and instead of trying to change law, the focus should be on creating awareness, speedy trials and convictions.
However, neither agreeing with the activists nor with Kejriwal, Congress MP and noted criminal lawyer K T S Tulsi said that lowering the age of juveniles to 16 years was necessary as it would give them a message that they cannot be let off easily.
Commenting on the issue, activist Ranjana Kumari said, "lowering the age of juveniles to try them as adults is a mindless suggestion and not a solution to curb the crime".
Similarly, advocate Vrinda Grover termed the suggestion as "retrograde step" and said that awarding harsh punishments to the juveniles would turn them into hardened criminals.
Also Read
Anant Kumar Asthana, also a child rights activist, said lowering the age will not be of any help in reducing crime against women.
"In case of incidents involving juveniles, it is not the question of lowering age but the need is for Juvenile Justice Boards (JJBs) to have a serious look and be given discretion to send a 16-year-old to normal court if required.
Kumari, Director for Centre for Social Research, said, "Instead of trying to change law, we should focus on community awareness, speedy trials and convictions. Juveniles need to be reformed.