"It's really inappropriate, deprecatory and contemptuous," said Justice Ubaid on false media reports which claimed that the court, while considering a case, had asked as to why the state vigilance director was not changed.
The court said earlier it had noticed some unhealthy instances of investigative excess on matters related to the state's Vigilance and Anti-corruption Bureau (VACB) and necessary directions were given to the government to correct the bureau.
The court also recalled that it had recently mentioned about a report submitted by the vigilance director regarding the investigation conducted in the Jisha murder case.
"This was probably misinterpreted, dishonestly or otherwise, by some TV channels, that the court has directed the government to change the vigilance director," it added.
More From This Section
Justice Ubaid observed that the court can speak only through judicial orders and he was doing so.
"As already observed, there was an attempt on the part of the media and some journalists and advocates, who participated in the discussion, to link a pending proceeding with the other matters now before the high court under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
"This is really dishonest and contemptuous," the court said.