In a brief submitted to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the former top officials argued that the executive order signed by Trump on January 27 was "ill-conceived, poorly implemented and ill-explained."
Trump's ban barred all refugees and travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the United States.
On Friday, following a lawsuit filed by the state of Washington challenging the ban, a federal judge in Seattle temporarily suspended Trump's order pending a wider legal review.
They included a brief from the prominent Democrats, who included Kerry, Albright and several top aides to ex-president Barack Obama.
More From This Section
Among them were national security advisor Susan Rice, CIA chief and defense secretary Leon Panetta, and homeland security chief Janet Napolitano.
"We view the Order as one that ultimately undermines the national security of the United States, rather than making us safer," they argued.
"Reinstating the Executive Order would wreak havoc on innocent lives and deeply held American values."
It also feeds Islamic State group propaganda that the United States is at war with Islam, it said.
Trump has defiantly defended his position and launched fiery tweets attacking the judge who suspended the travel ban.
"Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!" he said in a post yesterday.