Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Killing of inmate: Court pulls up Jail authorities, says SP's report 'false'

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 12 2014 | 5:30 PM IST
Terming as serious matter the killing of an undertrial by other inmates, a Delhi court has suggested that the possibility of a "cover-up" by the Rohini Jail authorities to save senior officers cannot be ruled out and said it required an independent probe.
The court pulled up the jail authorities for failing to prevent the April 25 murderous assault on Rajvinder, who was also a witness in a criminal case against his attackers, on the prison premises.
Additional Sessions Judge Kamini rejected as "false and factually incorrect" Jail Superintendent R S Nagar's report about the circumstances of his death and not informing the court about the incident until the case came up for hearing 10 days later. The official had said the lapse of not mentioning about the undertrial's death was committed "inadvertently".
Noting that the jail authorities had suspended junior officers, the court said it could have been an attempt to save those who were actually guilty of culpable negligence.
The court slammed the jail authorities for their failure in keeping a check over inmates who had managed to sneak into a different ward and had killed an undertrial, who was a witness in the case against them.
The court said it was a serious matter that undertrials were having a free access to any place in the jail complex without any inhibitions and added that it required an independent probe.

More From This Section

"...It is a serious matter that the undertrials can have a free access to any place in the complex without any inhibitions in the manner in which it has happened.
"How is it that undertrial prisoners housed in a different ward could have easily managed to sneak into a different ward duly armed with a 'kattan' (a dangerous weapon) without any inhibition, obstruction or anybody stopping them?
"This in fact is a serious matter requiring an independent probe/inquiry. This I say because the manner in which an action has been hurriedly initiated against comparatively junior officers of the rank of Head Warden and Warden by suspending them, is something which gives me a lurking feeling that perhaps something is amiss.

Also Read

First Published: May 12 2014 | 5:30 PM IST

Next Story