Those who support the idea do so with a caution that it will succeed if several safeguards, including juveniles' rehabilitation by providing them proper education, food and shelter, are taken care of.
However, C Raj Kumar, vice chancellor of O P Jindal Global University in Haryana, and child rights activist and lawyer Ananth Kumar Asthana took a diametrically opposite view saying tough provisions for juveniles in conflict with law have already failed in several countries and the real problem is not being addressed.
His view was echoed by Raj Kumar, also a rights activist, who said, "By not addressing the real problem in the society and only by lowering the age, we are shifting blame on the children."
Differing with them were noted senior criminal lawyer K T S Tulsi and another senior counsel H S Phoolka who said with change in law, juveniles in conflict with law will come to know that they cannot be let off easily.
More From This Section
"Criminal gangs take the advantage of this age criteria and it is the child who gets exploited by these gangs. Since the inception of this law, involvement of the children in crime has increased by around 300 per cent," Tulsi said.
"The blanket implementation of IPC for the heinous crimes will not be a welcome idea. There needs to be certain safeguards, like no death penalty will be awarded to such children. But above all, JJB Act first needs to be implemented properly," he said.