Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Lambodhara Textiles' promoters settle case with Sebi

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2017 | 7:22 PM IST
Markets regulator Sebi today settled a case with the promoters of Lambodhara Textiles for alleged violations of 'takeover' regulations on payment of Rs 55.25 lakh as settlement fee.
It was alleged that the promoters of the Lambodhara Textiles violated Sebi SAST (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 1997 by acquiring 68,077 shares of the company through off market mode.
While one of the promoters, Vimala Radhakrishnan, had acquired 5,500 shares of the company in June 2009 through off market mode, another promoter, Giulia Bosco had purchased 62,577 shares in August 2010 through the same method.
It was also alleged that the two promoters had acted in concert with company's other promoters -- Santosh and Strike Right Integrated Services.
After finding that the promoters had violated norms, Sebi initiated adjudication proceedings. While the proceedings were underway, the entities proposed a settlement through the settlement mechanism upon payment of Rs 55.25 lakh as settlement fee.
Thereafter, Sebi's High Powered Advisory Committee (HPAC) recommended that the matter may be settled on the payment of the amount offered. This was also approved by the panel of whole-time members of Sebi, following which the entities remitted the amount in October.

More From This Section

Sebi said that enforcement actions, including commencing or reopening of the proceedings, could be initiated if any representation made by the firm is found to be untrue.
Under the settlement mechanism, entities can seek to settle cases with the regulator after payment of certain charges and other expenses.
In a separate order, Ocean Agro and 10 other entities have settled a case, related to alleged non-compliance of minimum public shareholding norms of 25 per cent, with Sebi on payment of Rs 2 lakh.
The company was required to comply with the minimum public shareholding requirement by June 3, 2013. It was alleged that the firm did not comply with Sebi's directive within the prescribed time frame. However, the firm complied with the norms only on December 30, 2013.

Also Read

First Published: Jan 20 2017 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story