A bench of justices H L Dattu and A R Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through media notifications in at least two newspapers in the local region.
"Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.
"We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban," the bench said in an order.
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the apex court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quashing the acquistion.
On 24.10.1975, the state government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.
But the authorities issued no notice to the them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the state government on September 23, 1986.