The Commission said the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been in force for almost two decades in the country. But "in this period of time, although arbitration has fast emerged as a frequently chosen alternative to litigation, it has come to be afflicted with various problems including those of high costs and delays, making it no better than either the earlier regime which it was intended to replace or to litigation to which it intends to provide an alternative," the report of the law panel, submitted to Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, said.
"The object of quick alternative disputes resolution frequently stands frustrated," it said.
Though arbitration may be conducted ad hoc or under institutional procedures and rules, institutional arbitration provides distinct advantages which are unavailable to parties opting for ad hoc arbitration, it said.
The Commission has encouraged the culture of institutional arbitration in India which it said will go a long way to redress the institutional and systemic malaise that has seriously affected the growth of arbitration.