While issuing the direction to BCI, a bench of Justices Sunil Gaur and C Hari Shankar asked the lawyers' body why it settled on a figure of 1,440 seats for DU law faculty and not 2,000.
"Why 1,440 and why not 2,000? More students can have education. Why should it be curtailed?" the bench asked BCI and told it to communicate its decision to the court on June 7.
The varsity had sought permission to increase its seats for the law course saying it had improved its infrastructure and increased the strength of its teaching faculty.
The bench observed that BCI had not capped the seats because of lack of infrastructure and therefore, its improvement would not entitle the varsity to seek increase in seats offered for the course.
More From This Section
It, however, allowed the university to advertise for 1,440 seats only for its law course, as done last year, and said it would be subject to final outcome of a plea seeking increase of the seats to 2,310.
The petition also said that by reducing the seats, public money, which is used to provide grant to the varsity, was not being put to optimal use.
The PIL sought a direction to strike down clause 5 A of Schedule-III of Rules of Legal Education 2008 enacted by the BCI, claiming it was arbitrary, capricious and violative of fundamental rights.
Under Rule 5 A, a law college can admit only 300 students each year.