Researchers examined how passive versus active Facebook use affects users.
They completed two studies: one laboratory experiment, which allowed them to draw inferences about cause and effect, and one experience sampling study, which allowed them to examine how Facebook use undermines emotional well-being in daily life over time.
Across both studies, they found that passive use of Facebook leads to consistent declines in how good people feel over time, mainly by increasing feelings of envy towards others.
"These findings help illuminate how using Facebook undermines the way people feel," said Ethan Kross, University of Michigan associate professor of psychology, and study's senior author.
"They also provide people with a blueprint for how to reduce the negative effects that interacting with this technology may have on the way people feel," said Kross.
The first study involved about 80 undergraduate students. They were instructed to use Facebook actively or passively for 10 minutes in a controlled lab environment.
In the second study, the researchers examined whether passive Facebook use predicted similar outcomes when people engaged in this behaviour spontaneously in daily life.
About 80 undergraduate students were text messaged five times a day over six consecutive days.
Each text message contained a link to an online questionnaire that asked them to complete a series of questions to gauge their emotions and assess how frequently they used Facebook passively versus actively.
Passive Facebook use predicted increases in envy, which in turn predicted declines in how good people felt over time. Active Facebook usage did not.
The researchers note that the findings raise a question about why people continue to passively use Facebook if it negatively affects how they feel over time.
"It is possible that people's motivation to 'stay in touch' outweigh concerns they have over how interacting with this technology influences their feelings," said lead author Philippe Verduyn of the University of Leuven.
The finding appears in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app