When the petition by one Baby came up recently, Justice S Vaidyanathan dismissed it and observed that the loan waiver relief scheme was introduced for the benefit of small and tiny farmers who had lost their livelihood due to drought.
It was unfortunate that those who held more land were also claiming the relief meant for small farmers, he said.
The extension of the benefit to bigger farmers would affect small ones.
The big farmers would have other means for livelihood, but not small farmers, he noted.
More From This Section
Condemning the attitude of the petitioner, the judge said he was letting her off without imposing any fine, as she was a farmer.
Meanwhile, the government counsel claimed that the petitioner had filed a fake certificate to avail the loan waiver scheme.
During the enquiry it was found that she possessed more than five acres of lands, and she could not be given the benefit of loan waiver.
While small farmers are supposed to own between 2.5 acres and 5 acres, the tiny farmers need to possess less than 2.5 acres in order to avail the benefit.
The petitioner neither came under the category of small farmer nor tiny farmer and was ineligible for the waiver, he said.
She had obtained two different loans for the two bits of land.
The petitioner has claimed that she was a small farmer and had obtained loan for farm.
Since her crops failed she had sought loan waiver, she submitted.