The court also said that the government cannot deny proper infrastructure on the grounds of financial constraints.
A division bench of Justices A S Oka and A A Sayyed noted that it was the "state government's obligation to provide adequate number of courts, necessary infrastructure to them and proper facilities to the judicial officers, litigants and lawyers".
The observations were made in a judgement passed by the bench on May 5 while hearing a bunch of petitions raising concern over poor infrastructure at civil and criminal courts in the state and also consumer courts, both at the state and district levels.
The bench noted that the objective of the framers of the Constitution can be achieved only if the government ensures that adequate number of judicial officers are appointed and proper infrastructure is made available to courts and tribunals.
More From This Section
"The judiciary is considered to be a vital pillar of democracy. The common man has a lot of hope and expectations from the court," the judges said.
"The essential ingredients of infrastructure are adequate number of judicial officers, adequate space for courts and their officers and so on," the bench said.
"Facilities such as proper sitting arrangements, clean and equipped washrooms and toilets, supply of clean drinking water, information kiosks and so on ought to be made available for litigants," the court said.
The bench said that the government cannot deny proper infrastructure on the grounds of financial constraints.
The court also said that necessary steps will have to be taken to make all facilities in the court complexes easily accessible to persons with disabilities.
On the issue of cleanliness in court premises and toilets, Justice Oka said, "This issue is of paramount importance in view of the 'Swachh Bharat Abhiyan' initiated by the Government of India."
"In many court complexes in the state toilets and washrooms are stinking. All this should be maintained properly," he said.
On the issue of the structural stability of court buildings, the bench said the state government will have to take an appropriate policy decision by which a structural audit must be carried out for each building periodically.