Today, 68 years after that event, a petition in the Supreme Court claims that the identity of Apte remains mired in doubt and seeks reopening of the investigation into Gandhi's assassination.
Justice J L Kapur Commission of Inquiry, set up in 1966 to unearth the entire conspiracy, had reported Apte to have been in the Indian Air Force.
However, Manohar Parrikar as Defence Minister on January 7, 2016, had informed Dr Pankaj Phadnis, the petitioner in the apex court, that "no information related to Narayan Dattatraya Apte being an Air Force officer could be found anywhere".
The petitioner has contended that such information establishes the involvement of an alleged foreign hand in the assassination of the Father of the Nation on January 30, 1948.
More From This Section
Parrikar's letter states: "I have got the matter examined. I have been informed that the matter was referred to various agencies within the Air Force, MoD History Division as well as to AA at HCI, UK with the request to provide any information pertaining to Mr Narayan Dattatraya Apte.
The letter also said that the Gazettes of India (Air Branch) for the year 1943-46 were also searched but no information related to him being an IAF officer "could be found anywhere."
While seeking reopening of the probe into the Gandhi assassination case, Phadnis on the basis of the Parrikar's letter, has submitted to the apex court that "there is therefore reasonable ground to believe that Apte was an operative of British Force 136, which can be established only after further investigation."
He has raised question whether there was a fourth bullet which was also fired by someone apart from Nathuram Godse?
While Godse and Apte were sentenced to death in the trial that was held at the Red Fort, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was given the benefit of doubt due to lack of evidence on February 10, 1949.
There were 12 persons named in the charge sheet. One of the accused had turned approver while five were sentenced to life. Three persons were declared as absconders in the case.
Inspired by Savarkar, Abinav Bharat, Mumbai, which was set up in 2001, claims to work for socially and economically weaker sections with a focus on bridging their digital divide.
Phadnis said this case was one which concerned the truth behind the real hand or culprits who performed the dastardly act of Gandhi's killing and also their hidden agenda of derailing the Great Gandhi-Jinnah People-to-People Contact that the Mahatma had planned to embark upon.