Mathew hailed the decision of the Kerala High Court to stay the interim order recently issued by the lower court.
In his petition filed in the High Court, Mathew had submitted that the sub-court had no powers under the Code of Civil Procedure to gag the media from reporting the details of the case.
The Sub-Court judge of Karunagapally had issued the order on January 3, imposing restrictions on the media from publishing any defamatory statements against Chavara MLA Vijayan Pillai's son Sreejith.
"The right to know and inform is basic in our Constitution. Courts have upheld and protected this right all along," Mathew told PTI.
More From This Section
"The recent ban by a lower court in Kerala against publication of news in a financial fraud case allegedly involving a political leader's son was against this tradition and beyond its authority," he said.
He said it was reassuring that the High Court of Kerala had intervened to protect the basic rights of the media on a petition by Malayala Manorama.
He said the swift action taken by it was laudable especially in the context of a "cold war" between lawyers and journalists in Kerala courts.
"The gag order passed by the lower court was beyond the jurisdiction of that court. It was highly unconstitutional," Paul said.
The High Court had held that the order issued by the sub-court seemed "illegal and against constitutional mandate".
The lower court had issued the order on the basis of a complaint filed by Sreejith alleging that his name was being misused in connection with a criminal case.
Hasan Ismaeel Abdulla Almarzooqi, the owner of the tourism company, had planned to hold a press conference at the Press Club in Thiruvananthapuram on Monday evening with regard to its allegations against sons of political leaders.
However, it was cancelled after the sub-court issued the order.