Metropolitan Magistrate Pooja Aggarwal passed the order acquitting the South Delhi resident, saying he was entitled to be given the benefit of doubt.
"The prosecution has miserably failed to discharge the onus cast upon it in view of the various contradictions, improvements and variations in testimony of the eye witnesses brought forth and hence the prosecution has not been able to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, the accused is entitled to be given the benefit of doubt," the judge said.
The judge also noted that the complainant herself had made certain improvements in her statement during the cross- examination.
In its order, the court said "the veracity of the oral testimony of the eyewitnesses has been impeached."
Also Read
According to the prosecution, the complainant, her mother and her sister were waylaid, abused by the accused and his friends, which led to a quarrel resulting in injuries to the complainant and her family members.
The charge sheet was filed on February 2, 2010.
The accused, however, had denied the allegations made against him and claimed innocence.