A bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Deepa Sharma issued notice to Payal asking her to file a reply before the next date of hearing on April 23.
The court also sought her stand on an application moved by Omar seeking early hearing in the matter.
Advocate Malavika Rajkotia, appearing for Omar, claimed that the court had on an earlier date asked if the parties wanted to get married again. Replying on behalf of her client, the lawyer said Omar needs to have an option for remarrying.
The trial court had held that he had failed to prove irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
It had also said that Omar could not prove his claims of "cruelty" or "desertion" which were the grounds alleged by him for grant of decree of divorce.
In his appeal against the trial court order, Omar had claimed that his marriage had broken down irretrievably and he has not enjoyed conjugal relationship since 2007 and the couple, married on September 1, 1994, were living separately since 2009. The couple have two sons who are staying with their mother.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content