Such action would be against the very scheme of the Constitution, Justice D Hariparanthaman held, allowing a petition by one R Govindammal whose request for a job on compassionate ground after the death of her father was rejected by the government since she was married.
"The preamble of the Constitution ensures Equality of Status and opportunity to all citizens. Therefore, opportunity in public employment cannot be deprived to women on the ground of marriage while the same is not a restriction in the case of men," the Judge ruled.
Govindammal's application for compassionate appointment was rejected by the government on the sole ground that it cannot be granted to married daughters.
Justice Hariparanthaman, who quashed the rejection order, directed the Secretary, Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, to provide compassionate appointment to Govindammal within eight weeks.
More From This Section
"The dignity of women would not be assured if they are discriminated by the state in providing employment on compassionate ground.
The state can make law providing certain benefits exclusively for women and children as per Article 15(3) of the Constitution but cannot discriminate women in the matter of compassionate appointment on the ground of marriage.
The Judge also said if a government servant had only daughter as in this case, his widow cannot be told that her married daughter could not be provided appointment, particularly when she has to solely rely on her daughter.