"The exceptional reasons for the special mid-term or premature transfer ought to have been stated in writing.Vague, hazy and meager expression such as 'on administrative ground' cannot be a compliance to be considered apt and judicious enough in the face of mandatory statutory requirements," a bench noted in its recent order.
"We are satisfied in the case in hand that there was non-observance of the statutory requirements of the Act. The mid-term or pre-mature special transfer has to be strictly according to law, by a reasoned order in writing and after the due and prior approval from the competent authority concerned for effecting such special transfer under the Act," observed a bench headed by Justice Abhay Oak.
The petitioner Kishore Mhaske contended that he was posted in Mumbai in 2011 and according to the rules he could not be transferred for at least three years. Since this period has not expired, it was a mid-term transfer.
The impugned transfer order of May 30 last year in the absence of mention of special and exceptional reasons was passed obviously in breach of the statutory obligations and suffers from vices, the judges said.