The lawyer said the quantity of blood taken at the hospital did not match with the one received by a forensic lab for examination.
"Blood extracted by PW-20 (Dr Shashikant Pawar, Medical Officer at JJ Hospital in Mumbai) was 6 ml, which was stored in two vials of 3 ml each. However, PW-18 (Dattatray Bhalshankar, chemical analyser at Forensic Lab in Kalina) found 4 ml of blood only in one vial," Salman's lawyer Amit Desai told Justice A R Joshi of the Bombay High Court.
"It appears that what PW-18 (chemical analyser) has received is a completely different sample," the lawyer said.
The appellant (Salman) has been convicted with this kind of evidence, Desai argued and alleged that this is an addition to the chain of discrepancies.
More From This Section
Besides, the CA's report does not speak about the percentage of alcohol but talks only about the content of alcohol.
"This is confusing....So whether it is 'vial intact as per copy sent' or 'no copy sent'...An ambiguity has been created," Desai pointed out to the court.
The lawyer further said the "blood story" is curious -- it starts from Bhabha Hospital, which does not have the facility to draw blood and goes to the JJ Hospital, where oxalate, which is an anti-coagulant, has been shown as a preservative.