Media reports, almost overwhelmingly, expressed concerns over the future of thousands of steelworkers employed by Tata Steel at its plants in the UK.
In fact, one report stressed that the decisiveness over Mistry's removal should have been reflected in the Tata Group's plans for its UK steel units, which it had announced it would be shedding in March this year.
"The departure of Mistry as chairman could be good news for Tata Steel's 11,000 UK workers because Ratan Tata is a renowned Anglophile who bought the business in the first place...There is now a new uncertainty hanging over this deal. After months of worrying about their future, workers at the Port Talbot steelworks owned by Tata Steel could do without this," the British paper said.
Also Read
The newspaper quoted a person with "direct knowledge of the group's plans" as saying that the Port Talbot steelworks may well be "virtually safe" following Mistry's exit as the company is likely to invest "whatever it takes to make it efficient".
Meanwhile, the Unite union has called on Tata Steel to offer some certainty to steelworkers.
Unite's Indian-origin national officer, Harish Patel, said, "Steelworkers at Tata UK are world class and have been making some of the best steel in the world against a backdrop of continued uncertainty."
"Unite will be seeking guarantees about their jobs and pensions from Tata's new interim chairman who needs to act to bring certainty to the steel-making business along with a promise that Tata will continue to act as a responsible employer."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content