Allowing petitions filed by K V Jeyaraj, an aspirant for the post and I Ismail, a student, Justice V Ramasubramanian and Justice V M Velumani said the Vice-Chancellor did not have prescribed qualification - a minimum 10 years of experience as professor.
Rejecting the contention of the University counsel that no one was holding the post of Professor in any government college or aided college, the judges by pointing out to information provided under RTI Act said, 104 candidates whose applications were considered for the post were professors.
The Judges also rejected the contention that the VC was only going to be an academic head and is not going to be a teaching staff and hence such qualifications should not be insisted on, saying, "It is not possible for us to accept the interpretation that one can be academic head, but cannot be considered as part of the teaching staff."
Also Read
"To put bluntly, the respondents would not accept any prescription contained in UGC regulations in so far as qualifications are concerned, but would like to follow UGC regulations in respect of pay and allowances," they said.
"If we accept the contention that the Chancellor can appoint anyone as VC in the absence of prescription in the University Act and UGC rules are not applicable, then anyone without any qualification whatsoever can also be appointed," they said.