"I think he (A K Antony) has answered the question. He is speaking from the mindset of ten years of UPA rule when they were dictating the CBI what to do. I think somebody should remind them," Singh told reporters here.
Antony had said, "They cross-examined all witnesses. At no stage, names were revealed. My question is now CBI is with present government, ED (Enforcement Directorate) is with present government. Why delay, if there is evidence?"
Singh said, "Modi government does not interfere in day to day functioning of CBI...We have the propriety. We have the discretion to respect the independence and autonomy of the CBI and therefore we do not even enquire into what it is doing and what case is being pursued by it to what extent."
More From This Section
"But it is not so the case with the present government. As far as the case is concerned CBI has its own mechanism and procedures...If you follow the law...And if they have nothing to fear they should welcome the probe because it would be an opportunity for them to prove themselves innocent," he said.
"Instead we are afraid of the propriety, we are afraid of the Constitution, we are also afraid of accountability to the people of the country," he said.
"If they have nothing to hide where would they find a better opportunity to prove that there is nothing to hide," he added.
On the allegations of security breach, he said, "If it proves to be true this is a serious matter. It also would lead to another question that in the pursuit of material gains, we can sometimes tend to overlook security of the country."