The high court sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government on the institution's plea challenging the provisions of the 2015 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, contending that these were violative of freedom to practice, propagate and manage one's religious affairs guaranteed under the Constitution.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar issued notices to the Women and Child Development Ministry and the same department of the Delhi government for October 13 on the plea by 'Bachchon Ka Ghar', which claims to be a religious minority institution.
"Moreover, there would always lurk a danger of petitioner institution facing outrages from the public regarding forcible religious conversions etc," said the plea, which sought to declare certain provisions and rules of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 as violative of articles and ultra vires the Constitution.
Advocate Tushar Rao, who appeared for the institution founded in 1891, submitted before the court that the children were brought up in traditional Muslim practices including attending 'namaz' in a mosque, teaching of religious text, feeding non-vegetarian food, which the children from other faiths may not be comfortable with.
More From This Section
"It is therefore submitted that the provisions of the said Act and Rules, Regulations and the procedures under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 are violative and ultra vires the Constitution and ought to be struck down," the petition filed through advocates Mayank Sharma and Vikas Pakhiddey said.
It also sought the court's direction to Department of Women and Child Development to renew or issue a license to the society under the relevant provisions.
This section provides the CWC the right, authority and power to send or transfer any child in need of care and protection to the petitioner institution thereby creating an anomalous situation, it said.
"Moreover, the society does not fall within the meaning of 'children home', 'observation home', 'shelter home', 'place of safety', special adoption agency' or even a 'fit facility' as per the definitions contained in the Act," it said.
The plea said the petitioner was providing boarding, lodging, education regarding religious, moral, technical and others to more than 170 to 180 orphan children through its two institutions, one each for boys and girls.