"Fundamentally we need to fix this immigration system. It's not been working right," Senator Jeff Sessions told Senators in response to a question during his confirmation hearing convened by the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday.
"We've entered more and more millions of people illegally into the country. Each one of them produces some sort of humanitarian concern, but it is particularly true for children. So, we've been placed in a bad situation. I really would urge us all to work together," he said.
President-elect Donald Trump has indicated that criminal aliens, like President Obama indicated, certainly are the top group of people, he said.
"So I would think that the best thing for us to do, and I would urge colleagues that we understand this, let's fix this system," he said.
More From This Section
However, Sessions opposed any move towards amnesty of those who have entered the country illegally.
"I do believe that if you continually go through a cycle of amnesty, that you undermine the respect for the law and encourage more illegal immigration into America," he said.
"I believe the American people spoke clearly in this election. I believe they agreed with my basic view, and I think it's a good view, a decent view, a solid legal view for the United States of America that we create a lawful system of immigration that allows people to apply to this country, and if they're accepted they get it, if they're not accepted they don't get in," he said.
The Senator from Alabama said immigration flow was not on the basis of skills.
"Immigration flow from almost all of our countries, frankly, is based on a family connection and other visas rather than a skilled-based programme more like Canada has today, and that's all I intended to be saying there," he said, adding that he would like to see a skill-based immigration.
Immigration has been a high priority for the United States, he said, adding that it has been a leading country in the world in accepting immigration.
"I think as a nation, we should evaluate immigration on whether or not it serves and advances the nation interests, not the corporate interests," he said.