The victims of the decade-long Maoist conflict in Nepal have expressed "serious concern" over the intervention of political parties in the selection of office bearers to the two transitional justice mechanisms in the country.
The Nepal government formed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappeared Persons as part of its peace process.
More than 17,000 people, including security personnel, were killed during the Maoist insurgency which ended in 2006.
Chairperson of Conflict Victims Common Platform (CVCP) Bhagiram Chaudhary, in a press statement, said his organisation was concerned about the country's transitional justice process.
He alleged a "shameless deal" had been reached between the ruling Nepal Communist Party and the main opposition Nepali Congress to appoint the chairperson of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Thursday.
Former attorney general Raman Kumar Shrestha was appointed as the chief of the commission.
A lawyer who had close links with the then CPN-Maoist Centre and was imprisoned for accusations during the conflict has been chosen for the top post, the CVCP said referring to Shrestha.
Shrestha was the common candidate of both the ruling NCP and main Opposition Nepali Congress for the chairperson position.
The CVCP said Shrestha played a role contrary to the basic principles of transitional justice when serving as the attorney general.
Citing media reports, the CVCP said political parties were going to appoint members to the two commissions who had earlier been removed for their incompetence.
If the media reports are true then we will give a call to boycott both commissions, withdraw applications sent by the victims and approach the United Nations and other international justice mechanisms, the CVCP said.
The CVCP demanded that all commission members resign with immediate effect. It also appealed to the National Human Rights Commission to recall its representative from the recommendation committee.
"We do not find any sense of responsibility and concern among the members of the committee and they have made transitional justice process more complex," it added.The victims of the decade-long Maoist conflict in Nepal have expressed "serious concern" over the intervention of political parties in the selection of office bearers for the two transitional justice mechanisms in the country.
The Nepal government formed the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappeared Persons as part of its peace process.
More than 17,000 people, including security personnel, were killed during the Maoist insurgency which ended in 2006.
Chairperson of Conflict Victims Common Platform (CVCP) Bhagiram Chaudhary, in a press statement, said his organisation was concerned about the country's transitional justice process.
He alleged a "shameless deal" had been reached between the ruling Nepal Communist Party and the main opposition Nepali Congress to appoint the chairperson of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Thursday.
Former attorney general Raman Kumar Shrestha was appointed as the chief of the commission.
A lawyer who had close links with the then CPN-Maoist Centre and was imprisoned for accusations during the conflict has been chosen for the top post, the CVCP said referring to Shrestha.
Shrestha was the common candidate of both the ruling NCP and main Opposition Nepali Congress for the chairperson position.
The CVCP said Shrestha played a role contrary to the basic principles of transitional justice when serving as the attorney general.
Citing media reports, the CVCP said political parties were going to appoint members to the two commissions who had earlier been removed for their incompetence.
If the media reports are true then we will give a call to boycott both commissions, withdraw applications sent by the victims and approach the United Nations and other international justice mechanisms, the CVCP said.
The CVCP demanded that all commission members resign with immediate effect. It also appealed to the National Human Rights Commission to recall its representative from the recommendation committee.
"We do not find any sense of responsibility and concern among the members of the committee and they have made transitional justice process more complex," it added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve hit your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app