The study is the first to show that a point-of-care Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) test is faster than and as sensitive as a conventional lab-based molecular method used for clinical testing during the recent outbreak in Sierra Leone.
This new rapid diagnostic test (RDT) could cut back on the lengthy process usually required to confirm if a patient has EVD, help identify case contacts, and ultimately curb the spread of Ebola, according to the research published in The Lancet journal.
This method poses substantial risks to the healthcare workers responsible for blood collection, transport, and testing, and efforts to contain the Ebola epidemic in west Africa have been hampered by this slow and complex diagnostic test, researchers said.
"Laboratory results can sometimes take days to return," said Dr Nira Pollock, senior author and Associate Medical Director of the Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Laboratory at the Boston Children's Hospital, US.
Also Read
"This new test, on the other hand, is capable of detecting the Ebola virus in just a small drop of blood tested at the bedside, and could help us in the fight against Ebola," Pollock said.
Researchers compared the diagnostic accuracy of the new RDT against the benchmark RT-PCR test being used for clinical diagnosis in the field reference laboratory run by Public Health England at Port Loko in Sierra Leone.
Both RDT (on whole blood) and RT-PCR (on plasma) were also performed on 284 samples in the laboratory.
The RDT detected all confirmed cases of EVD that were positive by RT-PCR in both point-of-care (28/105 patients) and laboratory testing (45/277 patients), with sensitivity of 100 per cent, and a specificity of 92 per cent.