"We're not going to consider any changes prior to the World Cup. After the World Cup, the rules will be reviewed by the (ICC) Cricket Committee again. As I said, we wanted to create a more attacking 50-over game, one that could compete on the entertainment scales with T20 cricket," ICC CEO Dave Richardson said at a media interaction here today.
"It's too early to say. I think it has led to a more attacking game from a bowling and fielding perspective. Yes, runs per over might have increased and bowlers, at times on flat wickets, find it very tough. But the best bowlers are still top of bowling rankings and best batsmen are on top of batting charts. We just might need to change our perceptions," Richardson explained.
"In the old days, if you scored a run a ball, everyone said you had a tremendous strike-rate. Now they're saying you have to be in the 120-130 range. Ditto for bowlers. In the old days, Fanie de Villiers got upset, if he went for more than three runs per over. Now, bowlers only get upset when they go for more than six runs an over! Yes, things have changed. But I don't necessarily think for the worse."
"We've got certain minimum specifications. In fact, the regulations actually say you need to maximize the boundary size depending on the size of playing area. Sometimes we see boundaries are brought in contrary to regulation. We would like to ensure that moving forward, they are more pro-actively enforced," he said.
"There are still limits as to the maximum, so we don't want ridiculously large boundaries but as a basic principle, I'm very much in favour of it. A good hit can go for six but not necessarily a mishit," said Richardson.