When the contempt petition came up for hearing, first bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar adjourned the matter to November 14 which meant the SEC had to appear on that day again.
Along with the SEC, the poll body's Secretary S Rajasekar also appeared in the court for the third time in connection with the petition which sought contempt proceedings against the two officials for not complying with orders of the court on conducting local body elections.
The SEC and the secretary had appeared in the court on November 6 and 7 when their counsel made a plea seeking exemption from their further appearance which was strongly opposed by the DMK's senior counsel P Wilson.
The DMK counsel alleged that the SEC was deliberately postponing the civic polls. The dispensation of the officials' personal appearance was not a matter of right and they should continue to appear before the court till the disposal of the contempt petition, the counsel said.
More From This Section
Today, Wilson argued that about 1.31 lakh posts in various local bodies, including corporations, and panchayats, to be elected by the people, were lying vacant for more than one year and the court's order directing the SEC to complete the polls by November 17 was "brazenly defied".
Quoting the high court contempt rules, the counsel submitted that both the officials should be sent to jail straight away as they "have not only committed contempt so far but also have no intention to obey the court's order."
However, citing repeal of certain sections of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 by the state government through an ordinance on September 3, the SEC had later moved the court, saying there was a legal disability in conducting the polls as directed and sought to keep in abeyance the order.
The DMK questioned the urgency to issue the ordinance on a Sunday, one day prior to the court was to deliver its judgement, and claimed this "shows sheer abuse of power".